Why do AoE2 elitists hate our guts and hope we die in a garbage fire?

so, I was unfortnately on the AoE4 subreddit the other day, and I saw this post that was about how age of empires 4 should include the formations from aoe2. I personally found this very offensive, especially when someone critizised aoe3 for not having these. And then to make it worse, on the AoE2 subreddit I saw a post by one of the moderators there who was asking if age of empries 3 players would ruin AoE4 because of our "awful card system". I mean, i know that those age of empries 2 noobs who only know how to play a game if they can put up seven layers of walls on a forest map don't like how aoe3 randomly assigns cards to players who take the time to download the best home city, but I mean common? Calling us stupid because of that? gosh! I think that the problem with AoE2 players is that they are enjoying their 90s game even though in reality our game is better. For example, our game was made in the 2000s, their's in the 1990s. Just like how League of legends was made in the 2000s, so the AoE2 players need to stop trying to make AoE4 not a moba because in the 21st century mobas are the way to go. Another example how Aoe3 is better is that you can only make a certain amount ships so that water battles are now fair. Also, AoE3 is better because you can only make a certain amount of buildings which in turn rewards players who haven't been playing as exansionistic as better players, therefore making our game way more fair than theirs. I think that the real problem with aoe2 is that it put the graphics as a lower priority. yeah, i get that it was a 90s game, but hey Goldeneye 007 was a 90s game and it was a good game and it had a 3d engine so i think there's no excuse for Aoe2 not looking as good as aoe3 and I am really upset that those elitists can actually enjoy a game with good gameplay that might not have graphics that are up to snuff. Another thing is how they are so arrogant as to think that age of empries 3 has worse gameplay. I mean, I know that if the graphics were teh same aoe2 would be a better game but I mean comon' guys the 3d grafics impruv the gameplay. Also, I think that those elitsts don't understand how good the randomly unfair card system is. Let me lay it out to you. AoE2 HD players often complain about how many noobs there are in that game. But you see, the card system in aoe3 is unnatractive to noobs (noobs who aren't interested in moba dota games of course) because it is very difficult to understand easily and so the noobs leave because they don't enjoy the game, which is good for us die-hards because it means that even though our community is smaller it is less saturated with noobs which makes it more fun for me. Also, I am a troll and if you post by either agreeing with me or by yelling at my stupidity you sir are so hilariously niave it's hillarious. So, in conclusion I think it's very sad how aoe2 elitists are on the AoE4 subreddit making a post that was about how age of empires 4 should include the formations from aoe2. I personally found this very offensive, especially when someone critizised aoe3 for not having these. And then to make it worse, on the AoE2 subreddit I saw a post by one of the moderators there who was asking if age of empries 3 players would ruin AoE4 because of our "awful card system". I mean, i know that those age of empries 2 noobs who only know how to play a game if they can put up seven layers of walls on a forest map don't like how aoe3 randomly assigns cards to players who take the time to download the best home city, but I mean common? Calling us stupid because of that? gosh! I think that the problem with AoE2 players is that they are enjoying their 90s game even though in reality our game is better. For example, our game was made in the 2000s, their's in the 1990s. Just like how League of legends was made in the 2000s, so the AoE2 players need to stop trying to make AoE4 not a moba because in the 21st century mobas are the way to go. Another example how Aoe3 is better is that you can only make a certain amount ships so that water battles are now fair. Also, AoE3 is better because you can only make a certain amount of buildings which in turn rewards players who haven't been playing as exansionistic as better players, therefore making our game way more fair than theirs. I think that the real problem with aoe2 is that it put the graphics as a lower priority. yeah, i get that it was a 90s game, but hey Goldeneye 007 was a 90s game and it was a good game and it had a 3d engine so i think there's no excuse for Aoe2 not looking as good as aoe3 and I am really upset that those elitists can actually enjoy a game with good gameplay that might not have graphics that are up to snuff. Another thing is how they are so arrogant as to think that age of empries 3 has worse gameplay. I mean, I know that if the graphics were teh same aoe2 would be a better game but I mean comon' guys the 3d grafics impruv the gameplay. Also, I think that those elitsts don't understand how good the randomly unfair card system is. Let me lay it out to you. AoE2 HD players often complain about how many noobs there are in that game. But you see, the card system in aoe3 is unnatractive to noobs (noobs who aren't interested in moba dota games of course) because it is very difficult to understand easily and so the noobs leave because they don't enjoy the game, which is good for us die-hards because it means that even though our community is smaller it is less saturated with noobs which makes it more fun for me. So, in conclusion I think it's very sad how aoe2 elitists are looking down at our game and trying to change how AoE4 will turn out just because they don't understand. Thanks for reading!